An ordinary share award can appear straightforward until it sits beneath several classes of preferred shares. In a recent private-company assignment, the financial reporting analysis covered historical awards issued on three grant dates within a multi-class capital structure. This project required a point-in-time valuation for each grant date, allocation through the contractual share-class waterfall and a clear distinction between the value of each share ultimately recognised.
The preferred-share price was evidence, not the answer
A recent financing round can provide strong transaction evidence, but its subscription price normally relates to a particular preferred share class. That class may have liquidation preferences, conversion rights and other protections not available to ordinary shareholders.
Applying the preferred-share price directly to ordinary awards would therefore ignore the differences in classes between the instruments. The financing price is better treated as an observable input from which the company’s total equity value can be inferred.
Using a backsolve around the financing date
For grant dates sufficiently close to an arm’s-length financing, an option pricing model (OPM) backsolve can establish the total equity value consistent with the observed preferred-share price.
The process works in reverse:
1. Model the contractual liquidation and conversion outcomes for every share class.
2. Allocate a trial equity value through that capital structure.
3. Compare the resulting preferred-share value with the observed financing price.
4. Iterate until the model reproduces the transaction price.
This produces an implied equity value that reflects the financing terms rather than assuming every share has the same value.
Allocating equity value among the share classes
After solving for total equity value, the OPM allocates that value among the preferred and ordinary classes. The analysis may need to incorporate:1. Liquidation preferences and their order of priority;
2. Participation and conversion provisions;
3. Expected time to a liquidity event;
4. Equity volatility and the relevant risk-free rate;
5. Different exit scenarios and their probability weights; and
6. Class-specific discounts for lack of marketability.
The result is a separate per-share indication for the award class. This allocation exercise is distinct from valuing a conventional employee share option. A full-value ordinary share award with no exercise price should not automatically be treated as if it were an option granted at a strike price.
Calibrating a later grant date
A backsolved financing value becomes less persuasive as the interval between the financing and grant date increases. For a later award date, the analysis should consider whether the company’s performance, market conditions and valuation environment have changed.
In the assignment, the later valuation was calibrated using movements in an appropriate market multiple drawn from listed comparable companies. Selecting the multiple required professional judgement: the metric needed to reflect the company’s business model and principal source of value.
This market calibration updated the financing-based anchor without introducing information that was not known or reasonably knowable at the later grant date.
Separating per-share fair value from the expense schedule
IFRS 2 is the primary accounting standard for share-based payment transactions. For equity-settled employee awards, the measurement focuses on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments granted. Service conditions and expected forfeitures are generally addressed through the number of awards expected to vest and the related recognition pattern, rather than by changing the underlying fair value per share.
This distinction creates two connected but separate workstreams:
1. Determine the supportable fair value per award share at each grant date.
2. Develop the accounting schedule using the applicable vesting terms, service conditions, forfeiture evidence and actual leaver information.
IFRS 13 provides the broader fair value framework, but the IFRS Foundation notes that IFRS 13 does not specify the measurement and disclosure requirements for share-based payment transactions. The accounting analysis should therefore remain anchored to IFRS 2 and the corresponding Singapore standard.
Contact Valtech to discuss further details on financial instruments valuation services, such as ordinary share awards, employee incentive plans and valuation requirements for financial reporting.
